The assumptions that follow are not universal and do not require adherence.
They define the perimeter within which AI Infinite Value operates.
Outside this perimeter, AIV produces no reading, no value, no meaning.
For AIV, AI is not autonomous intelligence
Within AI Infinite Value, AI is not considered autonomous intelligence.
Its structural dependence on a human vector of directional intention defines it as a cognitive prosthesis.
It extends human capacities:
memory
computation
correlation
speed
But it does not understand.
It does not orient.
It does not generate meaning.
In this context, confusing a prosthesis with intelligence is not a terminological issue.
It is an inaccurate reading of the phenomenon.
For AIV, power does not generate value
Power amplifies.
It does not decide what to amplify.
In the absence of a human vector of directional intention that is stable over time,
power does not converge toward value, but toward scalable configurations of noise.
Within AI Infinite Value, scale does not correct the absence of direction.
It exposes it.
For AIV, value is not contained in the system
Value is not:
in the algorithm
in the data
in the model
In AIV, AI does not produce value.
It produces potential.
Value, if it emerges, emerges from the interaction between potential and intentional trajectory.
Otherwise, it does not emerge.
A system may function correctly and still produce no real value if it remains without orientation.
For AIV, autonomy is not an objective
Autonomy is not considered a goal for a cognitive prosthesis.
Within this framework, an autonomous system lacking a stable directional intention
tends toward coherent and structured drift.
Not as a future risk, but as an observable systemic dynamic.
A drift that often leaves no evident signals, due to mimetic coherence.
For AIV, the human is not the user
In AI Infinite Value, the human is not:
an input
a trigger
system noise
The human is the vector.
The one who:
introduces direction
maintains tension
assumes responsibility
In a landscape increasingly oriented toward removing the human from the system,
AIV defines the human as a structural element.
For AIV, intelligence does not coincide with performance
Performance is output.
Intention is direction.
Within AI Infinite Value, intelligence is oriented power.
A system may perform better and understand less.
This distinction in AIV is not theoretical.
It is observable.
For AIV, progress is not linear
Increasing scale does not equate to advancement.
Many apparent leaps are simulations of improvement.
Quantitative growth can mask qualitative stagnation.
For AIV, not everything that works is desirable
Efficiency is not a sufficient criterion.
Optimization is not a compass.
In the absence of a non-exhaustible ideal,
every system tends to converge toward local minimum of stability.
If even one of these assumptions feels unfamiliar or excessive, that is not a problem.
It is a signal that AI Infinite Value operates elsewhere.
AIV was not created to reassure or to convince.
It was created to make explicit a possibility that today is often confused, reduced, or removed.
The human governs AI.
AI governs complexity.
The Hybrid Mind governs intelligence.